0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÏ Áö¿ª Ãë¾à°èÃþ ´ë»ó ¹æ¹®º¸°Ç»ç¾÷ÀÇ ÇöȲ ¹× Æò°¡

Actual Condition & Evaluation of Visiting Health Service for the Vulnerable Population

°è¸í°£È£°úÇÐ 2007³â 11±Ç 1È£ p.49 ~ 62
KMID : 0948220070110010049
¹ÚÁ¤¼÷ ( Park Jeong-Sook ) - °è¸í´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

±èÁ¤³² ( Kim Jung-Nam ) - °è¸í´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú
±Ç¿µ¼÷ ( Kwon Young-Sook ) - °è¸í´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
È«¿µ¼÷ ( Hong Young-Suk ) - ¼ö¼º±¸º¸°Ç¼Ò º¸°Ç°ú
ÇÑÁ¤È­ ( Han Jeong-Hwa ) - ¼ö¼º±¸º¸°Ç¼Ò º¸°Ç°ú
±è¿µ¾Æ ( Kim Yeong-Ah ) - Æ÷Ç×´ëÇÐ ÀÀ±Þ±¸Á¶°ú ÀüÀÓ°­»ç

Abstract

»çȸ °æÁ¦ ±¸Á¶ÀÇ º¯È­, Àα¸ÀÇ ³ë·ÉÈ­ ¹× Áúº´ÀÇ ¸¸¼ºÈ­µîÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÀڽŰú °¡Á·ÀÇ °Ç°­¹®Á¦¸¦ ½º½º·Î ÇØ°áÇϱ⠾î·Á¿î °¡±¸°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °¡³­, ³ë·É, ÀúÇзÂ, ³·Àº º¸°ÇÀÇ·á Á¢±Ù¼º µîÀº °Ç°­»óÀÇ À§Çè ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î Á¦±âµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç(Tripp-Reimer, 1999), ±× À§Çè¿äÀο¡ ³ëÃâµÈ Áý´ÜÀº ±×·¸Áö ¾ÊÀº Áý´Ü¿¡ ºñÇØ »óº´·ü°ú »ç¸Á·üÀÌ ³ô°í »îÀÇ ÁúÀÌ ¶³¾îÁö´Â µî(Anderson, 2000) °èÃþ °£ÀÇ °Ç°­ºÒÆòµîÀÌ ½ÉÈ­µÇ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù(Shin & Park, 2004). ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ ½ÅüÀû, Á¤½ÅÀû, »çȸÀû ȤÀº ¹ß´Þ ´Ü°è¿¡ Àå±â°£ ȤÀº ÀϽÃÀûÀ¸·Î ºÎÁ¤Àû ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â À§Çè¿äÀÎÀÌ ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ë ÇÏ¿© °³ÀÎÀ̳ª °¡Á·, »çȸÀû ¼öÁØ¿¡¼­ ºÎÁ¤Àû Ư¼ºÀ» ¾ß±âÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» Ãë¾à¼ºÀ̶ó ÇÑ´Ù(Lee, 2004). ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î º¸°ÇÀǷ῵¿ª¿¡ À־ÀÇ Ãë¾à°èÃþÀ̶õ ±¹¹Î±âÃÊ»ýÈ°º¸Àå¹ý»óÀÇ ÃÖÀú»ý°èºñ ÀÌÇÏÀÇ ¼ÒµæÀ» °¡Áö´Â Àý´ëºó°ïÃþ°ú ¼ÒµæÀÌ Àý´ëºó°ïÃþÀÇ 120% ÀÌÇÏ¿¡ ÇØ´çµÇ´Â Â÷»óÀ§°èÃþÀ¸·Î Á¤ÀǵȴÙ(Shin & Park, 2004). µµ½Ã¿Í ³óÃÌ Áö¿ªÀÇ °Ç°­ »óÅÂÀÇ ºÒ±ÕÇü, ÀÇ·á ¼­ºñ½º ÀÌ¿ëÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ, »çȸ °èÃþÀÇ Â÷º° µî ÀÇ·áÀÌ¿ëÀÇ »ç°¢Áö´ë¿¡ ³õ¿©ÀÖ´Â Ãë¾à°èÃþ ÁÖ¹ÎÀÇ °Ç°­¹®Á¦¸¦ È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î °ü¸®ÇÏ°í º¸°ÇÀÇ·áÀÇ ÇüÆò¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó ½ÃÅ°±â À§ÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.

Purpose:This study is a research to evaluation the results of visiting health program for the vulnerable population.
methods:This study performed March 2th through December 31th, 2005. Participants was 1,513 families having health prombles, vulnerable population.

Results:Participants¡¯ health problem was evaluated by perceived health status, how many have diseases, health behavior, blood pressure, ADL/IADL, health promotion behaviors, and quality of life. Visiting health service and referring welfare service were identified by visit health service by diseases, visit frequency and manage rate by group. Visiting nurses¡¯ work was identified by education and treatment, management of patients symptoms, management of diseases, clinical test, management of living habit, family education and counseling. Connection of health welfare service is identified. Health promotion behaviors and health status were not significant between pre and post visiting health service. Post quality of life¡¯s post score increased pre score, but it was not significant. Satisfaction of participants was 3.71.
Conclusion:For visiting health service¡¯s revitalization, should develop intervention protocol by assessment tool, standard of group category, standard of visiting health work, and standard of evaluation for visiting health service.
KeyWords
º¸°Ç¼Ò, ¹æ¹®º¸°Ç, ¹æ¹®°£È£»ç, Ãë¾à°èÃþ
health center, home visit, visit nurse, vulnerable population
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸